ENVIRONMENT OF RESPECT AND EMPOWERMENT
Employee engagement and efficiency
102-7 401-1
Indicator | Unit of measurement | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Reporting perimeter | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average employee headcount | people | 1,680 | 1,815 | 1,984 | 1 | |
Average number of male employees | people | 924 | 1,023 | 1,156 | 1 | |
Average number of female employees | people | 756 | 792 | 828 | 1 | |
Total number of employees at year end | people | 1,760 | 1,981 | 2,199 | 1 | |
Total number of male employees at year end | people | 932 | 1,093 | 1,246 | 1 | |
Total number of female employees at year end | people | 828 | 888 | 953 | 1 | |
Wages and other payments to employees (including benefits) | RUB, billion | 7.1 | 8.5 | 9.9 | 1 | |
401-1 | New employee hires, total | people | 346 | 484 | 683 | 1 |
New employee hires as a percentage of the workforceThis indicator was calculated as the ratio of employees hired to the number of employees at year end. | % | 20 | 24 | 31 | 1 | |
New male employee hires | people | 200 | 320 | 435 | 1 | |
New male employee hires as a percentage of the workforce | % | 21 | 29 | 35 | 1 | |
New female employee hires | people | 146 | 164 | 248 | 1 | |
New female employee hires as a percentage of the workforce | % | 18 | 18 | 26 | 1 | |
New employee hires under 30 years of age | people | 147 | 170 | 255 | 1 | |
New employee hires under 30 years of age as a percentage of the workforce | % | 56 | 54 | 66 | 1 | |
New employee hires 30 to 50 years of age | people | 186 | 288 | 405 | 1 | |
New employee hires 30 to 50 years of age as a percentage of the workforce | % | 16 | 22 | 27 | 1 | |
New employee hires over 50 years of age | people | 13 | 26 | 23 | 1 | |
New employee hires over 50 years of age as a percentage of the workforce | % | 4 | 8 | 7 | 1 | |
New employee hires who are disabled | people | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
Trainees | people | 37 | 42 | 67 | 1 | |
Trainees hired upon completion of traineeship | people | 10 | 12 | 14Trainees employed in 2021 continue their traineeship; the final number of trainee hires will be known in autumn of 2022. | 1 | |
Dismissed employees, total | people | 265 | 270 | 460 | 1 | |
Dismissed male employees | people | 154 | 163 | 279 | 1 | |
Dismissed female employees | people | 111 | 107 | 181 | 1 | |
Dismissed employees under 30 years of age | people | 78 | 73 | 127 | 1 | |
Dismissed employees 30 to 50 years of age | people | 142 | 155 | 280 | 1 | |
Dismissed employees over 50 years of age | people | 45 | 42 | 53 | 1 | |
Employee turnoverThis indicator was estimated as a ratio of number of employees dismissed at their request within a year to the average number of employees in the reporting year. | % | 11.1 | 7.9 | 18 | 1 | |
Turnover of male employees under 30 years of age | % | 2.1 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 1 | |
Turnover of female employees under 30 years of age | % | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1 | |
Turnover of male employees 30 to 50 years of age | % | 4 | 3.4 | 7.1 | 1 | |
Turnover of female employees 30 to 50 years of age | % | 2.4 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 1 | |
Turnover of male employees over 50 years of age | % | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1 | |
Turnover of female employees over 50 years of age | % | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1 | |
Variance in employee turnover compared to last year (full-time employees) | p.p. | 2.3 | -3.4 | 10.1 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodologyThe indicator was estimated as a ratio of employees who quit, retired, died, or were dismissed within a year, to the number of employees at year-end.) | % | 15.1 | 13.6 | 21 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodology), women | % | 13.4 | 12 | 19 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodology), men | % | 16.5 | 14.9 | 22.4 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodology), under 30 years of age | % | 29.7 | 23 | 32.9 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodology), 30 to 50 years of age | % | 11.8 | 11.6 | 18.9 | 1 | |
Employee turnover (as per GRI methodology), over 50 years of age | % | 15.1 | 13 | 16.1 | 1 | |
Variance in employee turnover, as per GRI methodology | p.p. | -0.9 | -1.5 | 7.4 | 1 | |
Percentage of employees who underwent a satisfaction/engagement review, total | % | - | 86 | 85.1 | 1 | |
Percentage of engaged employees | % | - | 85 | 86.2 | 1 | |
Percentage of loyal employees | % | - | 84 | 81.4 | 1 | |
Percentage of satisfied employees | % | - | 87 | 87.9 | 1 |
405-1
Members of the Supervisory Board, total | people | 12 | 12 | 12 | 1 |
Percentage of male members of the Supervisory Board | % | 83 | 83 | 83 | 1 |
Percentage of female members of the Supervisory Board | % | 17 | 17 | 17 | 1 |
Percentage of members of the Supervisory Board under 30 years of age | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentage of members of the Supervisory Board 30 to 50 years of age | % | 42 | 42 | 42 | 1 |
Percentage of members of the Supervisory Board over 50 years of age | % | 58 | 58 | 58 | 1 |
Senior executives, total | people | 20 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
Male senior executives | people | 13 | 10 | 10 | 1 |
Female senior executives | people | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Percentage of male senior executives | % | 65 | 71 | 77 | 1 |
Percentage of female senior executives | % | 35 | 29 | 23 | 1 |
Percentage of senior executives under 30 years of age | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentage of senior executives 30 to 50 years of age | % | 70 | 64 | 54 | 1 |
Percentage of senior executives over 50 years of age | % | 30 | 36 | 46 | 1 |
Functional department managers, total | people | 382 | 408 | 429 | 1 |
Male functional department managers | people | 231 | 254 | 273 | 1 |
Female functional department managers | people | 151 | 154 | 156 | 1 |
Percentage of male functional department managers | % | 60 | 62 | 64 | 1 |
Percentage of female functional department managers | % | 40 | 38 | 36 | 1 |
Percentage of functional department managers under 30 years of age | % | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 1 |
Percentage of functional department managers 30 to 50 years of age | % | 72.8 | 72.8 | 76.9 | 1 |
Percentage of functional department managers over 50 years of age | % | 25.4 | 24.3 | 20.3 | 1 |
Functional department managers with disabilities | people | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Specialists, total | people | 1,327 | 1,544 | 1,742 | 1 |
Male specialists | people | 657 | 814 | 948 | 1 |
Female specialists | people | 670 | 730 | 794 | 1 |
Percentage of male specialists | % | 50 | 53 | 54 | 1 |
Percentage of female specialists | % | 50 | 47 | 46 | 1 |
Percentage of specialists under 30 years of age | % | 19.3 | 19.8 | 21 | 1 |
Percentage of specialists 30 to 50 years of age | % | 67.1 | 66.3 | 65 | 1 |
Percentage of specialists over 50 years of age | % | 13.6 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
Specialists with disabilities | people | 9 | 9 | 8 | 1 |
Workers, total | people | 31 | 15 | 15 | 1 |
Percentage of male workers | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
Percentage of female workers | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentage of workers under 30 years of age | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentage of workers 30 to 50 years of age | % | 54.8 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 1 |
Percentage of workers over 50 years of age | % | 45.2 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 1 |
401-3 102-41
Total number of employees who were entitled to parental leave | people | 1,680 | 1,815 | 1,984 | 1 | |
| people | 924 | 1,023 | 1,156 | 1 | |
| people | 756 | 792 | 828 | 1 | |
Employees who took parental leave, total | people | 42 | 30 | 29 | 1 | |
| people | 41 | 30 | 28 | 1 | |
| people | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Employees who returned to work after parental leave, total | people | 34 | 26 | 20 | 1 | |
| people | 34 | 26 | 20 | 1 | |
| people | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Employees who returned to work after parental leave ended who were still employed 12 months after their return to work | people | 21 | 25 | 14 | 1 | |
| people | 20 | 25 | 14 | 1 | |
| people | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Return to work rate (ratio of the total number of employees who did return to work after parental leave to the total number of employees due to return to work after taking parental leave this year) | rate | - | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1 | |
| rate | - | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1 | |
| rate | - | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Retention rate (percentage of employees retained in the company after returning to work following a period of parental leave) | rate | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| rate | - | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| rate | - | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Number of complaints received with respect to violations of employees’ right to freedom of association and collective bargaining | complaints | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
102-41 | Percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreementsNo collective bargaining agreements are in force at any companies of the Group. During training sessions on the Code of Professional Ethics, employees are informed of their right to participate in trade unions. Employees are also made aware that if they feel this right has been violated, they use the Speak up! hotline, where their complaint will be reviewed and appropriate measures will be taken. | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Percentage of employees in trade unions | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Learning and development
404-1 404-3
Indicator | Unit of measurement | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Reporting perimeter | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
404-1 | Hours of training, total | hours | 48,683 | 23,993 | 40,812 | 1 |
Average hours of training per year per employee (as per GRI)In this report, the average hours of training per year per employee has been calculated using the formula set out in the GRI standard: the total number of training hours is divided by the total number of employees (at year end). | hours | 28 | 12 | 19 | 1 | |
Average hours of training per year per female employee | hours | 29 | 11 | 17 | 1 | |
Average hours of training per year per male employee | hours | 26 | 13 | 20 | 1 | |
Percentage of employees who completed training, total | % | 79 | 60 | 43 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per male senior executive | hours | 31 | 34 | 84The average number of hours of training per year per male senior executive is calculated against the total number of male senior executives at year end (four people), rather than the number who actually underwent training (five people). | 1 | |
Number of training hours per female senior executive | hours | 66 | 18 | 50 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per male functional department manager | hours | 53 | 23 | 40 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per female functional department manager | hours | 57 | 26 | 49 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per male specialist | hours | 18 | 10 | 14 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per female specialist | hours | 23 | 8 | 10 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per male worker | hours | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Number of training hours per female worker | hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Percentage of employees of the relevant departments who completed sustainability management training, out of the total number of employees | % | - | - | 10 | 2 | |
404-3 | Percentage of employees who underwent a regular performance and career development review, total | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
Percentage of male senior executives who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of female senior executives who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of male functional department managers who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of female functional department managers who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of male specialists who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of female specialists who underwent a regular performance and career development review | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 | |
Percentage of employees for whom goals have been set (under a performance appraisal) | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
Diversity and equal opportunity
405-1 405-2 406-1
Indicator | Unit of measurement | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Reporting perimeter | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of women out of the total number of employees | % | 47 | 45 | 43 | 1 | |
Percentage of women on the Supervisory Board | % | 17 | 17 | 17 | 2 | |
Percentage of women out of the total number of functional department managers | % | 40 | 37 | 36 | 1 | |
Percentage of women out of the total number of senior executives | % | 35 | 28 | 23 | 1 | |
Percentage of women in managerial positions in profit-generating areas of the business (front officeThis indicator was first calculated in 2020.) | % | - | 31 | 31 | 1 | |
Average gender pay gap: all employees | rate | - | 1.39 | 1.33 | 1 | |
Average gender pay gap: functional department managers | rate | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.15 | 1 | |
Average gender pay gap: specialists | rate | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1 | |
Total number of confirmed incidents of discrimination in the reporting period | incidents | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Total number of confirmed incidents of discrimination for the reporting period | incidents | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
202-1 | Average pay of entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses: total | RUB | 82,500 | 85,680 | 94,170 | 1 |
Average pay of entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses: males | RUB | 82,000 | 85,260 | 95,700 | 1 | |
Average pay of entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses: females | RUB | 83,000 | 88,100 | 85,700 | 1 | |
Minimum statutory monthly pay in Moscow | RUB | 20,185 | 20,195 | 20,589 | 1 | |
Ratio of the average pay of entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses, to the minimum statutory monthly pay in Moscow | rate | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1 | |
Ratio of the average pay of male entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses, to the minimum statutory monthly pay in Moscow | rate | 4.06 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1 | |
Ratio of the average pay of female entry-level specialists and workers, including bonuses, to the minimum statutory monthly pay in Moscow | rate | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1 | |
Availability of variable remuneration in the form of shares for employees, other than senior management | - | yes | yes | yes | 1 |
Occupational health and safety, and employee well-being
403-9 403-10
Indicator | Unit of measurement | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Reporting perimeter |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of employees who completed OHS trainingAs pertains to GRI 403-9 and 403-10, data is only collected for employees of Moscow Exchange Group. The Group does not collect any data on work-related injuries and accidents among its business partners. | people | 374 | 517 | 360 | 1 |
Number of work-related injuries, total | incidents | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Number of work-related injuries among employees | incidents | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Work-related injury rate (ratio of the number of work-related injuries of employees to the total number of hours worked) | rate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Cases of work-related illness | number | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Fatalities as a result of work-related illness | number | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Rate of absenteeism | rate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Number of workplaces for which a special assessment of working conditions was carried out | workplaces | 103 | 958 | 0 | 1In 2019, the assessment was carried out for NCC only, while in 2020 it was carried out for Moscow Exchange and NSD. In 2021, no special assessments were carried out. |